Why the NCAA shouldn’t punish Penn State football

By Finesse

In a lot of places, the Freeh Report released Thursday has ignited an arms race for the dramatic: How badly should the NCAA punish Penn State for the Sandusky scandal? The internet is littered with stories advocating “the death penalty” for Penn State football.

But here’s how many Penn State football games the NCAA should cancel: Zero. The NCCA needs to ask itself only 3 questions: 1) What are we preventing? 2) Who are we punishing? and 3) Who are we helping? When the answers to those questions are nothing, everyone, and no one, respectively, then the NCAA shouldn’t cancel a single game.

What are we preventing? 

Everyone agrees this should never happen again. But does ending the Penn State football program get us closer to that?

Over the course of 100-plus years of college football across hundreds of schools, nothing like this has ever happened before. So before we decide that everything associated with Penn State and college football generally is broken, consider: Is child abuse and the failure to report it really a systemic problem that’s pervasive in college football programs? This isn’t the Catholic Church with its thousands of incidents across the globe and its celibacy vow that, let’s just say, attracts a certain type of person. This is one sick monster who infected an otherwise pretty good institution led by people who did the wrong thing. If there are institutional problems, then do the hard thing that requires thoughtfulness and effort: change the culture of the institution. Don’t take the easy road and destroy it.

If missing football games is needed as a deterrent to other schools, consider what the president of another university would have to think when presented with reports that someone was molesting children on campus.

President: “Ok, so I have this report of child abuse in front of me, what am I going to do. Hmm. If I don’t report it, I’ll make myself and my university the subject of ridicule for a generation, get arrested, have the football coach’s reputation destroyed, and have this be the only thing anyone ever thinks about me or my school for the rest of time. Nah, not going to report it.”  

Adviser: “Yeah, but if you don’t report it, you will be ineligible for the Capitol One Bowl.”  

President: “CALL 911!!!!!” 

Shutting down Penn State football would absolutely send a strong message, but so would exhuming Paterno’s body and decapitating him during halftime of the Super Bowl. And you could end petty theft if you cut off pickpockets’ hands. But at this point, other schools don’t need to see Penn State’s program destroyed to get the message that they should report child rape any more than a clown needs to see PeeWee Herman go to jail to get the message that it’s a bad idea to masturbate at the movies. 

Who are we punishing? 

Beyond the students and current players, who have done nothing wrong and deserve to play at the school they wanted to, the State College community would bear the enormous economic burden of cancelled games. Some have argued that the State College community is not “innocent” because it helped deify a football program. But does that really make the guy who owns a hotel in Bellefonte or the guy who rents RVs in State College deserving of punishment? If it does, then the entire country is guilty, including the columnists and their media organizations who have done more deification than anyone.

Sure, the community would survive cancelled games — after all, it’s just football. But they’d be casualties of a vengeful napalming of a football program all in the name of … what exactly? We could have dropped an atomic bomb on Tokyo but the war was over.

Any punishment the NCAA could dole out would have no impact on the actual people responsible. That cast of characters includes a child rapist in jail for life, a dead guy, three guys under indictment and a redhead with terrible judgment. They’re all punished. And if you find out more individuals were responsible, punish them, too. 

Who are we helping? 

When this scandal was unfolding back in November, you couldn’t find a channel or website that wasn’t screaming at you, “This is about the kids!” So if this whole thing should be about the kids, then we have to consider how punishing the Penn State football program helps the kids.

I’m not going to presume that Sandusky’s victims feel one way or the other about punishing the football program, although some people already have, including Jeremy Schapp, who suggested that Paterno’s statue be replaced with one “dedicated to the boys who were raped by Sandusky.” (Do we really think they want a statue of this?)  But even if we knew how they felt, and whether they were all united in feeling that way, it wouldn’t matter.  We don’t live in a country where the victims of crimes get to decide the punishment of the people who harmed them.  If that were the case, your neighborhood thief would have his head on a stake outside King’s Landing.  I feel bad for Sandusky’s victims and what they went through is terrible.  I don’t pretend to know their pain.  But it doesn’t mean they have jurisdiction over the future of Penn State football.

You could actually do a lot more to help the fight against child abuse by not cancelling any football games. Today, the single best resource in perhaps the entire country to raise awareness of child abuse is the Penn State football program. It has a bigger national platform than any university has ever had. They should use it to do something good. Something proactive, not reactive. Because here’s the truth: the same people who are complaining that the football program is too big are only interested in this case to such an extreme degree because the football program is so big. If the football program goes away, so does the spotlight on helping victims of child abuse. 

So here’s what the NCAA should say in a nutshell: What happened at Penn State is terrible and can never happen again. We’re going to work with Penn State, and all of our schools, to make sure that it doesn’t. But shutting down football there gets us no closer to that end, so we’re going to use this opportunity to do something positive, not something borne out of a thirst for vengeance. 

And maybe we’ll even have some fun watching football along the way.

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “Why the NCAA shouldn’t punish Penn State football

  1. Nice post, Finesse.I'm not a PSU fan. I don't follow college athletics. I don't know the law nor how the NCAA should respond. I'm not a supporter of child abuse either and have been on a slow boil for a long time over the Catholic Church cover-ups. You'd think I would want to see this 'death penalty' but after reading DK's blog and now your post, I feel that the best thing is to be moderate and fair. Put ourselves in each of the postions and try to imagine what it would be like. Use proof and the law to address the perps. Everyone recognize that what happened is bad. Resolve to stamp-out abuse where it occurs (RC Church), but avoid swinging a big hammer and destroying everything (PSU).Moderate.Fair.The golden rule.Serious stuff – lives at stake.

  2. I have to disagree with you Finesse.The money being allocated to the football program and the perception of the football program we're the primary reasons that people turned a blind eye to what Sandusky was doing.Penn State University it a quality institution, but it's not ok to allow them to operate just as before come this august. It's breeds a sense of "everything is back to normal" and that's not right because things haven't been "normal" for almost two decades. Key members of their administation as well as the face of the university ignored one of the biggest scandals in recent memory for the sake of their football program and one man's legacy!In the end no money or perception should be so important that human welfare is overlooked. Yet that's what was allowed to happen. There are plenty of other places to channel the money coming into penn state other than their football program. -Limit their scholarships and the money available to their program and you prevent the incentive to overlook similar incidents from occuring.-Limit their scholarships and the money available to their program and you punish those bought into a culture where football and joe paterno were more important than the boy who dottie called a "troublemaker".-Limit their scholarships and the money available to their program and you help restore the belief the university is more interested in educating people and doing the right thing than filling their football stands.If not, then penn state supporters care more about turning a blind eye to what went on and forgetting about it. Just like Joe did! And that's classless and shameful.

  3. Shameful? That's a strong charge, David. But maybe your approach is best because if the NCAA takes away scholarships, the side benefit is that no one will be able to get in trouble for getting free tattoos.

  4. Or a decade worth of decreased scholarships and limited money for the football program will help to change a culture. Radio talk shows still present too many examples of people who believe the Freeh Report isn't valid enough to make a decision off of.In my mind these are people who soo want to believe that joe was innocent of wrong doing that they are willing to deny the obvious because if they don't it tears at a personal belief system.Can I accept the fact that paterno's family won't accept what their father did or did not do?…Sure, but the rest of the people which refuse to accept the fact that Joe Paterno and the Penn State football program were at the heart of why Sandusky wasn't brought up on charges back in 1998, should wake the heck up.

  5. There are some people whose minds cannot be changed about any subject, and people who call into radio talk shows are the spokespeople for them. If people like them truly hold unreasonable and inflexible beliefs, there is no amount of message-sending that's going to change them. So you can put whatever fault you want on Penn State, Paterno, the fans (for whatever reason), and spend all the time you want crafting the perfect punishment but you're spinning your wheels anytime you're trying to send a message to people on the extreme of either side of an issue.

  6. On a seperate note….the penguins just had a development cap….where is the analysis gentlemen? There just isn't enough hockey talk nowadays….and 19 years of losing baseball has greatly limited my interest in the pirates..lol.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s